By:
Cecilia Blomberg

The power of voting: Why general meeting decisions matter

For Nordea Funds, voting at general meetings is more than a formality — it is a cornerstone of responsible investment and active ownership. And the goal is to bring value to you who has invested in our funds.

auditorium lecture

Voting at AGMs (Annual General Meeting) is a strategic tool to safeguard shareholder value and promote sound corporate governance, As the largest asset manager in the Nordics, Nordea holds a strong position to drive positive change in the companies they invest in.

Why voting matters

"At Nordea, we believe that sound corporate governance contributes directly to shareholder value and the long-term success of equity investments," says Richard Torgerson, Corporate Governance Director at Nordea Asset Management. "Our voting activities are not just about ticking boxes—they are about securing long-term shareholder value and ensuring our unitholders' interests are protected."

 

 Richard Torgerson

Richard Torgerson

Corporate Governance Specialist i Nordea

During the first half of 2025, Nordea voted at 2,682 shareholder meetings, opposing management on 10.5% of agenda items—primarily on issues related to executive compensation and board composition.

"We assess every shareholder proposal on a case-by-case basis, always asking: Will this improve company practices or shareholder value? Our goal is to support proposals that enhance transparency, ESG risk management, and long-term value creation," explains Richard Torgerson.

Driving change through engagement

Nordea’s voting is closely linked to its engagement efforts. During the first half year of 2025 there has been several cases where Nordea’s active involvement led to tangible improvements:

Board Diversity: Nordea has successfully advocated for commitments to address gender imbalance on boards, demonstrating our proactive approach to governance.

Nomination Committees: By pushing for external shareholder representation, Nordea helped strengthen governance frameworks and shareholder democracy.

Executive Compensation: Nordea voted against compensation packages lacking transparency or meaningful performance criteria. Nordea pushes for incentive programs that can help motivate long-term value creation.

 

Looking ahead

"As regulations evolve and new challenges emerge, our commitment to responsible investment and active ownership remains unwavering. Voting at AGMs is how we can use our voice—and we use it to advocate for better governance, sustainability, and shareholder value," concludes Richard Torgerson.

Voting report H1 2025

Nordea Funds voting report January - June 2025

In this report you can find more details about how we voted in the first part of 2025.

Read the voting report